Haifeng Machinery

Caterpillar C1.1 vs Kubota D905-E2BG-CHN-1

Compare Caterpillar C1.1 and Kubota D905-E2BG-CHN-1 by recorded output, operating duty, frequency and engine specifications. Their listed displacements are 1.1 L and 0.905 L, respectively. Start with the same duty and frequency, then check each model’s source and package conditions. These records alone do not establish interchangeability.

SpecificationCaterpillar C1.1Kubota D905-E2BG-CHN-1
Standby electrical (50 Hz)7.6 kWe7 kWe
Prime electrical (50 Hz)6.8 kWe6 kWe
Standby electrical (60 Hz)8.8 kWe8 kWe
Prime electrical (60 Hz)8 kWe7 kWe
Other recorded mechanical power (duty unspecified)6.8 kWNot listed
Displacement1.1 L0.905 L
ConfigurationL3L3
Cylinders33
Recorded engine speed1,500 RPM1,500 RPM
FuelDieselDiesel
CoolingLiquid-CooledLiquid-Cooled
Recorded emissions classificationEuro Stage IIIAUnregulated
Dry weightNot listedNot listed
OriginJapanJapan

Compare matching ratings

Read across a row to compare the same operating duty and frequency. kWe is electrical output; mechanical kW is power at the engine shaft. kVA is apparent electrical power and is shown only when kWe is missing, without converting it. “Not listed” means the record lacks that rating, not zero output. Continuous and prime duties are kept separate. Check source documents, units and site conditions before comparing values.

An emissions classification in the catalog is not proof of certification for your engine or installation. Confirm the exact model, applicable documents and generator configuration.

Caterpillar C1.1: Review the model record and available supporting documents

Kubota D905-E2BG-CHN-1: Review the model record and available supporting documents

Choosing between Caterpillar C1.1 and Kubota D905-E2BG-CHN-1

Use this comparison as an engineering shortlist, then confirm the complete generator package against load profile, voltage, 50/60 Hz frequency, duty class, emissions rules, cooling margin, altitude, ambient temperature, enclosure design, controller features, and alternator sizing.