Cummins C2000N6CD vs MTU 16V4000 GS
The Cummins C2000N6CD and MTU 16V4000 GS are both natural gas generator engines in a similar power class. Both are rated at roughly 2,518 kVA. Displacement is 78 L versus 76.3 L. The table below compares their full specifications side by side.
| Specification | Cummins C2000N6CD | MTU 16V4000 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Headline rating | 2,500 kVA | 2,535 kVA |
| Standby (50 Hz) | — | — |
| Prime (50 Hz) | — | 2,028 kWe |
| Standby (60 Hz) | — | — |
| Prime (60 Hz) | 2,000 kWe | — |
| Displacement | 78 L | 76.3 L |
| Configuration | V12 | V16 |
| Cylinders | 12 | 16 |
| Rated speed | 1,800 RPM | 1,500 RPM |
| Fuel | Natural Gas | Natural Gas |
| Cooling | Liquid-Cooled | Liquid-Cooled |
| Emissions | — | Unregulated |
| Dry weight | — | — |
| Origin | United States | Germany |
Choosing between Cummins C2000N6CD and MTU 16V4000 GS
Use this comparison as an engineering shortlist, then confirm the complete generator package against load profile, voltage, 50/60 Hz frequency, duty class, emissions rules, cooling margin, altitude, ambient temperature, enclosure design, controller features, and alternator sizing. The MTU 16V4000 GS has the higher headline kVA rating in this pair, but site conditions and duty cycle can still change the final recommendation.