Haifeng Machinery

Daihatsu 6DK-26e vs MTU MTU 16V4000 G74F

Compare Daihatsu 6DK-26e and MTU MTU 16V4000 G74F by recorded output, operating duty, frequency and engine specifications. Their listed displacements are 121 L and 76.3 L, respectively. Start with the same duty and frequency, then check each model’s source and package conditions. These records alone do not establish interchangeability.

SpecificationDaihatsu 6DK-26eMTU MTU 16V4000 G74F
Standby electrical (50 Hz)1,765 kWe1,769 kWe
Prime electrical (50 Hz)1,623.8 kWeNot listed
Standby electrical (60 Hz)Not listedNot listed
Prime electrical (60 Hz)Not listedNot listed
Displacement121 L76.3 L
ConfigurationL6V16
Cylinders616
Recorded engine speed750 RPM1,500 RPM
FuelDieselDiesel
CoolingLiquid-CooledLiquid-Cooled
Recorded emissions classificationUnregulatedUnregulated
Dry weightNot listedNot listed
OriginJapanGermany

Compare matching ratings

Read across a row to compare the same operating duty and frequency. kWe is electrical output; mechanical kW is power at the engine shaft. kVA is apparent electrical power and is shown only when kWe is missing, without converting it. “Not listed” means the record lacks that rating, not zero output. Continuous and prime duties are kept separate. Check source documents, units and site conditions before comparing values.

An emissions classification in the catalog is not proof of certification for your engine or installation. Confirm the exact model, applicable documents and generator configuration.

Daihatsu 6DK-26e: Review the model record and available supporting documents

MTU MTU 16V4000 G74F: Review the model record and available supporting documents

Choosing between Daihatsu 6DK-26e and MTU MTU 16V4000 G74F

Use this comparison as an engineering shortlist, then confirm the complete generator package against load profile, voltage, 50/60 Hz frequency, duty class, emissions rules, cooling margin, altitude, ambient temperature, enclosure design, controller features, and alternator sizing.