Deutz F4L2011 vs FAWDE 4DW92
Compare Deutz F4L2011 and FAWDE 4DW92 by recorded output, operating duty, frequency and engine specifications. Their listed displacements are 3.1 L and 2.7 L, respectively. Start with the same duty and frequency, then check each model’s source and package conditions. These records alone do not establish interchangeability.
| Specification | Deutz F4L2011 | FAWDE 4DW92 |
|---|---|---|
| Standby electrical (50 Hz) | 26 kWe | 26 kWe |
| Prime electrical (50 Hz) | 23.4 kWe | 24 kWe |
| Standby electrical (60 Hz) | 29.9 kWe | Not listed |
| Prime electrical (60 Hz) | 26.9 kWe | Not listed |
| Displacement | 3.1 L | 2.7 L |
| Configuration | L4 | L4 |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Recorded engine speed | 1,500 RPM | 1,500 RPM |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cooling | Oil-Cooled | Liquid-Cooled |
| Recorded emissions classification | Euro Stage IIIA | Unregulated |
| Dry weight | Not listed | Not listed |
| Origin | Germany | China |
Compare matching ratings
Read across a row to compare the same operating duty and frequency. kWe is electrical output; mechanical kW is power at the engine shaft. kVA is apparent electrical power and is shown only when kWe is missing, without converting it. “Not listed” means the record lacks that rating, not zero output. Continuous and prime duties are kept separate. Check source documents, units and site conditions before comparing values.
An emissions classification in the catalog is not proof of certification for your engine or installation. Confirm the exact model, applicable documents and generator configuration.
Deutz F4L2011: Review the model record and available supporting documents
FAWDE 4DW92: Review the model record and available supporting documents
Choosing between Deutz F4L2011 and FAWDE 4DW92
Use this comparison as an engineering shortlist, then confirm the complete generator package against load profile, voltage, 50/60 Hz frequency, duty class, emissions rules, cooling margin, altitude, ambient temperature, enclosure design, controller features, and alternator sizing.