Haifeng Machinery

Hatz 1D81C vs Perkins 403J-07G

Compare Hatz 1D81C and Perkins 403J-07G by recorded output, operating duty, frequency and engine specifications. Their listed displacements are 0.667 L and 0.7 L, respectively. Start with the same duty and frequency, then check each model’s source and package conditions. These records alone do not establish interchangeability.

SpecificationHatz 1D81CPerkins 403J-07G
Standby electrical (50 Hz)4.2 kWe5 kWe
Prime electrical (50 Hz)3.8 kWe5 kWe
Standby electrical (60 Hz)5.1 kWeNot listed
Prime electrical (60 Hz)4.6 kWeNot listed
Displacement0.667 L0.7 L
ConfigurationL1L3
Cylinders13
Recorded engine speed1,500 RPM1,500 RPM
FuelDieselDiesel
CoolingAir-CooledLiquid-Cooled
Recorded emissions classificationU.S. EPA Tier 4 InterimUnregulated
Dry weightNot listedNot listed
OriginGermanyChina

Compare matching ratings

Read across a row to compare the same operating duty and frequency. kWe is electrical output; mechanical kW is power at the engine shaft. kVA is apparent electrical power and is shown only when kWe is missing, without converting it. “Not listed” means the record lacks that rating, not zero output. Continuous and prime duties are kept separate. Check source documents, units and site conditions before comparing values.

An emissions classification in the catalog is not proof of certification for your engine or installation. Confirm the exact model, applicable documents and generator configuration.

Hatz 1D81C: Review the model record and available supporting documents

Perkins 403J-07G: Review the model record and available supporting documents

Choosing between Hatz 1D81C and Perkins 403J-07G

Use this comparison as an engineering shortlist, then confirm the complete generator package against load profile, voltage, 50/60 Hz frequency, duty class, emissions rules, cooling margin, altitude, ambient temperature, enclosure design, controller features, and alternator sizing.