MTU MTU 12V4000 G24F vs Perkins 5016AC-E61TRG0
The MTU MTU 12V4000 G24F and Perkins 5016AC-E61TRG0 are both diesel generator engines in a similar power class. Both are rated at roughly 1,938 kVA. Displacement is 57.2 L versus 61 L. The table below compares their full specifications side by side.
| Specification | MTU MTU 12V4000 G24F | Perkins 5016AC-E61TRG0 |
|---|---|---|
| Headline rating | 1,950 kVA | 1,925 kVA |
| Standby (50 Hz) | 1,560 kWe | 1,540 kWe |
| Prime (50 Hz) | 1,418 kWe | 1,400 kWe |
| Standby (60 Hz) | — | — |
| Prime (60 Hz) | — | — |
| Displacement | 57.2 L | 61 L |
| Configuration | V12 | V16 |
| Cylinders | 12 | 16 |
| Rated speed | 1,500 RPM | 1,500 RPM |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cooling | Liquid-Cooled | Liquid-Cooled |
| Emissions | Unregulated | Euro Stage II / China National Stage III |
| Dry weight | — | — |
| Origin | Germany | United Kingdom |
Choosing between MTU MTU 12V4000 G24F and Perkins 5016AC-E61TRG0
Use this comparison as an engineering shortlist, then confirm the complete generator package against load profile, voltage, 50/60 Hz frequency, duty class, emissions rules, cooling margin, altitude, ambient temperature, enclosure design, controller features, and alternator sizing. The MTU MTU 12V4000 G24F has the higher headline kVA rating in this pair, but site conditions and duty cycle can still change the final recommendation.