Haifeng Machinery

Hatz 4L41C vs John Deere 3029TFG89

Compare Hatz 4L41C and John Deere 3029TFG89 by recorded output, operating duty, frequency and engine specifications. Their listed displacements are 3.1 L and 2.9 L, respectively. Start with the same duty and frequency, then check each model’s source and package conditions. These records alone do not establish interchangeability.

SpecificationHatz 4L41CJohn Deere 3029TFG89
Standby electrical (50 Hz)27 kWe27 kWe
Prime electrical (50 Hz)24 kWe24 kWe
Standby electrical (60 Hz)33 kWe30 kWe
Prime electrical (60 Hz)30 kWe27 kWe
Displacement3.1 L2.9 L
ConfigurationL4L3
Cylinders43
Recorded engine speed1,500 RPM1,500 RPM
FuelDieselDiesel
CoolingAir-CooledLiquid-Cooled
Recorded emissions classificationEuro Stage IIIAEuro Stage IIIA / U.S. EPA Tier 3
Dry weightNot listedNot listed
OriginGermanyUnited States

Compare matching ratings

Read across a row to compare the same operating duty and frequency. kWe is electrical output; mechanical kW is power at the engine shaft. kVA is apparent electrical power and is shown only when kWe is missing, without converting it. “Not listed” means the record lacks that rating, not zero output. Continuous and prime duties are kept separate. Check source documents, units and site conditions before comparing values.

An emissions classification in the catalog is not proof of certification for your engine or installation. Confirm the exact model, applicable documents and generator configuration.

Hatz 4L41C: Review the model record and available supporting documents

John Deere 3029TFG89: Review the model record and available supporting documents

Choosing between Hatz 4L41C and John Deere 3029TFG89

Use this comparison as an engineering shortlist, then confirm the complete generator package against load profile, voltage, 50/60 Hz frequency, duty class, emissions rules, cooling margin, altitude, ambient temperature, enclosure design, controller features, and alternator sizing.